Mills v Pridge, 2025 ABCA 220
[1] The appellant Donna Mills and respondent Donald Pridge lived together as adult interdependent partners for approximately 25 years. Following their separation in 2019, the appellant claimed adult interdependent partner support and exclusive possession of their home. The respondent cross-applied for sale of the home and for the proceeds to be divided equally. The chambers judge determined the appellant was entitled to indefinite support, but currently at a rate of $0 per month due to the respondent’s medical status and inability to work, and that the home should be divided equally subject to certain adjustments in the appellant’s favour. The appellant appeals those decisions. For the following reasons, the appeal is dismissed.
Continue reading “Mills v Pridge, 2025 ABCA 220”